Football season ended a couple of weeks ago for me as the
Green Bay Packers were humbled by the New York Giants. I don't invest as much
emotion in the outcome of games as I used to, but it didn't make me feel great
to see my team lose.
The Packers were even the beneficiaries of some questionable
calls during the game, and still lost. It's interesting how we look at some
things. When it's our team - and there's
a questionable call that goes our way, it was the absolute correct call for the
referee to make. And when there's a
questionable call that goes against our team, it was the absolute wrong call
for the official to make.
The rightness or wrongness of the call by the official
should have nothing to do with which team we're rooting for. If it's a penalty, or whatever, then it
should be judged on its merit and not based on the team.
But as any sports fan will tell you, that logic isn't part
of the game. We always want
what's most beneficial to our team regardless of the circumstance.
And maybe that's OK with sporting events - although I'm doubtful. Moreover, it
shouldn't apply to our politics and indeed most other areas of life.
I went to a Doctor's appointment a while back, and we were
making a bit of small talk.
The conversation turned toward politics, and I made a
comment about the current Administration. My Doc became a bit riled up and
insisted that the current Administration is much better than the previous
Administration without question.
Now at times like this, I like to apply what I think of as
the "Glenn Greenwald intellectual honesty test". I use this to help me determine whether I
should spend any additional time attempting to discuss an issue with someone.
It's a pretty simple test, and I frame it this way: If you
were angry with the "Old Boss", and the "New Boss" comes
in, and does the exact same things as the "Old Boss", will you also
be angry with the "New Boss"?
If you're not angry with the "New Boss", because
he/she is your "guy"/"gal", then in my estimation you're not being
intellectually honest and you're simply rooting for "your team".
Now, you're entitled to do that, but if that's the case, I
find it useless to spend much
time trying to have a discussion with you because there's
some basic honesty that's missing. And so, I'll probably switch the
conversation to Sports, because I understand the "my team right or wrong
mentality".
Election season is upon us, and we're again presented with
the same old choices: Democrats who serve the elite, versus Republicans who
serve the elite. That's basically it. And for some reason we've become convinced that Third Parties are a waste of time. You certainly won't hear them getting much play in the so-called Mainstream Media.
If you look back over the past 30-40 years and you wonder why some of
our big problem issues have not been solved, and in many cases no real efforts
even made to solve them, I believe it all comes down to who our
"representatives" are actually serving.
I remember during the 2008 campaign, then Senator Obama
making the point that it's not for a lack of white papers or plans that these
problems go unsolved. He described it as
a lack of political will. And he told us that he would change that culture, and
get the big important things done.
"Political will" doesn't appear to be the real
issue. The real issue appears to be who
the two party system actually serves and who it doesn't.
And until we break out of the "My team...right or
wrong" mindset; WE THE PEOPLE will continue to be on the losing team.
No comments:
Post a Comment